Archive for April 28th, 2009

28
Apr
09

Secret Communist Arlen Specter Gives Dems Their Supermajority

Breaking news here from the NY Times:

Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania said on Tuesday he would switch to the Democratic party, presenting Democrats with a possible 60th vote and the power to break Senate filibusters as they try to advance the Obama administration’s new agenda…
Mr. Specter faced a primary challenge from former Republican Congressman Pat Toomey and polls showed him trailing Mr. Toomey. But he had previously resisted overtures to join the Democrats.

‘Atta boy, Senator.

So let’s sum up the GOP’s week so far, shall we?

1. Texas Governor Rick Perry talks about secession in the name of getting the Feds off his lawn.
2. Said Governor pleads for help with the Swine Flu outbreak.
3. Just as torture and its prosecution were becoming divisive and foremost in Americans’ minds, said outbreak puts health care back into the public consciousness, as well as how much the Feds help in times of crisis.
4. In said times of crisis, Americans pull together…except Rush Limbaugh, who tries to link Obama’s trip to Mexico with the outbreak.
5. After trying to bully the last of their Mohicans up in the Northeast, he defects, giving Dems the right to do whatever the fuck they want in the Senate.

Is this proof there’s a God? And that he hates Republicans?

28
Apr
09

4Chan Pwns Time

First, these guys infiltrate beloved institutions like “America’s Next Top Model”, and now this? What next? Hacking into a Disney site and making Mickey do things to Goofy that are illegal in 48 states (like get married)???

To tell the truth, I’m a bit ambivalent about what 4chan’s many, many minions have done to Time’s new poll on “The Most Influential People In The World”. On the one hand, it’s a stupid poll set up by an obsolete news source (which is, in the words of Jon Stewart, for people who like USA Today but wish it were shinier), so it might as well be these guys that fuck with it as Colbert fans. Plus, the reference to “marble cake” made me spit coffee onto my keyboard.

On the other, ol’ Chris Poole disseminating his influence into mainstream channels can only help our poor aging population come to grips with the fact that they don’t matter anymore. Come on, moot, they have so little left already (teeth, bladder control, calcium, naturally-occurring erections).

Side note: Li’l Wayne was in the running?

28
Apr
09

The Times’ New Human Dildo Wants Presi-Dick Cheney

Having spectacularly canned über-douche Bill Kristol, the New York Times sought a new token conservative columnist for their Op-Ed section (David Brooks doesn’t count, since he’s a known communist for not liking Sarah Palin). But they were left with a dilemma: Would they be able to find someone as TOTALLY misguided as their previous “lightning rod” conservative commentator? God knows if it’ll last, but newbie Russ Douthat is sure as shit gonna give it a go!

His new column, entitled “Cheney For President,” is full of the kind of reasoning that made Bill Kristol famous (i.e. it bears as much resemblance to real reason as Kool Aid does to real fruit).

Watching Dick Cheney defend the Bush administration’s interrogation policies, it’s been hard to escape the impression that both the Republican Party and the country would be better off today if Cheney, rather than John McCain, had been a candidate for president in 2008.

OK, so now we know Mr. Douthat is (a) batshit crazy, and (b) has a special kind of blindness that is totally unable to see poll numbers.

As a candidate, Cheney would have doubtless been as disciplined and ideologically consistent as McCain was feckless. In debates with Barack Obama, he would have been as cuttingly effective as he was in his encounters with Joe Lieberman and John Edwards in 2000 and 2004 respectively. And when he went down to a landslide loss, the conservative movement might – might! – have been jolted into the kind of rethinking that’s necessary if it hopes to regain power.

Ah, I see. So here’s a guy who’s going to make the common-sensical Republican argument: that the wrong conclusion has been drawn by their members after McCain’s loss. They need to go more center to be more inclusive, rather than further right, which is shrinking their base. Got it.

If a Cheney defeat could have been good for the Republican Party; a Cheney campaign could have been good for the country.

Wait, wha-huh?

The former vice-president’s post-election attacks on Obama are bad form, of course, under the peculiar rules of Washington politesse. But they’re part of an argument about the means and ends of our interrogation policy that should have happened during the general election and didn’t – because McCain wasn’t a supporter of the Bush-era approach, and Obama didn’t see a percentage in harping on the topic.

Wait, how the fuck did torture enter into this argument. Is it because it is, in and of itself, such tortured logic? Is it because it is torture to read? What the hell is going on here???

But better if this debate had happened during the campaign season. And better, perhaps, if Cheney himself had been there to have it out.

That’s your summation? But that doesn’t explain it at all! What the hell are you talking about???

I need a cookie.




Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 390 other followers